Comparing the Rights of the Individual in Handmaids Tale and Invisible Man :: comparison compare contrast essays

Rights of the Individual in Handmaids Taleand Invisible gentle musical compositions gentleman The Handmaids Tale, by Marg aret Atwood, and Invisible globe, by Ralph Ellison, are two novels which use an essentially invisible central character to comment on the manipulative power society holds over people, destroying the individual. Offred, the protagonist of The Handmaids Tale, and the fibber of Invisible Man are both invisible as individuals and are manipulated by society to become a dehumanized natural resource. The authors of these two whole kit and caboodle use the protagonist to criticize societys use of certain groups of people only as resources to reach a goal, ignoring the individuality of these people.The very names, or lack thereof, of the briny characters indicate their invisibility in the eyes of society. Offred is named after her commander she is Freds possession and therefore of Fred. Her original name is never mentioned. Likewise, the name of the narrator of Invisi ble Man is never mentioned. When he joins the Brotherhood, he is given a new name. Both Offred and the narrator of Invisible Man meet their real names as a source of self-identification, yet society refuses to use their real names.Offred is a natural resource to Gilead because she is one of few women who still have viable ovaries. She describes the existence of the handmaids We are two-legged wombs, thats all sacred vessels, ambulatory chalices. We are containers, its only the insides of our bodies that are important. What we prayed for was emptiness, so we would be worthy to be filled with grace, with love, with self-denial, with semen and babies. (pg. 176, 124, 251) The narrator of Invisible Man is a resource is a similar way. The Brotherhood uses him as a speaker to advance their efforts to take power over the blacks. He saysWhat was 1, a man or a natural resource? (pg. 303)Offred is seen not as an individual, but as one of a group of women who must serve the Republic of Gilead. When Offred asks the air force officer for skin lotion, she says, Our hands get very dry. For some reason I said our instead of my. (pg. 203) Here she sees herself as one of many handmaids, as she was taught to see at the Red Center. The narrator of Invisible Man, like Offred, finds himself identifying with a group and not with himself. He says, they usually think in terms of we while I have always tended to think in terms of me.

Oliver Cromwell as a Hero or Villain Essay examples -- History Ireland

The aim of this undertake, is to answer the long-awaited question Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain? This question, is a hard one to answer. pack Heath once said His name and memory stink. In opposition, Samuel Pepys said People look back and praise him. True? Or Not? This essay will argue Edmond Ludlows words, How glorious, unless then such betrayal Oliver Cromwell was neither a hero nor a villain. The evidence and opinions gathered will state, how he went from levelheaded to bad, and from bad to evil. Oliver Cromwell, was a puritan gentleman from Huntingdon. He was born on the 25th of April 1599, and brought up in a very wealthy family, and a postgraduate social class. Cromwell, was an MP for Huntingdon, from 1628-1629. He had no fighting experience then, and was very worried active the Roundhead army, at the battle of Edgehill. Cromwell then went home to Huntingdon, and began to train his give army. Cromwell was a magnificent soldier. He created a whole new army from scratch, and he trained his army, in a special and unique way. Cromwell would do anything to come along his battles, and beat Prince Rupert and if it meant making a whole new army, than so be it. To do this, he picked his people of their ability, men of spirit, and not on their status. He did this believing that this was right, as they were doing Gods will. It also made the people happy, and so he continued doing so. He also paid the men. He paid them 12D a day, so that encouraged more men to stay. He was a strict commander, and his orders had to be obeyed. Also, he always chose the right moment in a battle to attack. Some local Roundheads, image that Cromwell should have ... ...er, but he just did what he felt he had to do. One thing which I agree on, is that he could have gone about it a different way. Also, I agree in one thing that he said, and also believed in. That was that The end justifies the Means. What he meant by that, was that no matter what happens, something satisfactory always comes out at the end, and its the end outcome that really matters. The words that I will leave you with, atomic number 18 the words of one Richard Baxter, a parliamentarian. We are not sure whether we can trust these words or not, as being a parliamentarian, he would have been a bit sympathetic to Cromwell, but its quite reasonable. No man was better and worse spoken of than he, he meant honestly, and was pious till power corrupted him, he thinketh that the end being just and necessary, the necessary means cannot be bad

Old Testament Vs. Hellenic Divine Intervention :: essays research papers

old(a) Testament vs. Hellenic Divine Intervention     The Old Testament and Hellenic texts we have studied have numerousexamples of divine intervention. The range and complexity in human affairs thatthese interventions occur have similar, merely different attributes. Both textsdescribe divine intervention as a way of explaining "why things happen(ed) andbeing "chosen" by God or gods to run a destiny. Both also see divineintervention as something that can not be understood by humans God or the godshave their reasons why multitude are "chosen" and why certain gifts, events, andcatastrophes happen and we will never understand the reasoning. Differences inthe texts stem from the reasons they are the resembling why certain people are chosen,why events happen, etc.     The range and complexity in human affairs of divine intervention as draw in the Hellenic texts and the Old Testament are similar because of theinterference in human affairs, yet they are different because of why certainpeople are chosen to fulfill a destiny. For instance, in the Old Testament, Godchooses Noah and his family to be the only survivors after the flood that wipesout the earth. His destiny was to build the ark and flash a pair of every livingcreature to help repopulate the earth after everything is wiped out. This issimilar to Oedipus at Colonus, in the Hellenic texts, because the gods chooseOedipus to save the urban center of Colonus from his own sons. They differ because God,in the Old Testament, chooses rather blindly. He does not choose people for anyreason except that is who He cherished. If He does choose, it is found on goodnessor loyalty to Him. The gods of Hellenic texts, like in Oedipus at Colonus, thegods choose Oedipus because of his wisdom and his family line. The Hellenictexts choose based on prestige, family, and honor. other example of this isthe story "Joseph" in the Old Testament. Joseph was chos en to be a powerfulruler in Egypt for no reason whatsoever, just because God wanted him to be. InThe Illiad, this would never happen, Achilles is chosen to defeat Hector becauseof his prestige, honor, and family line. Achilles is not chosen because Zeusjust wanted him to. Not just anybody could have killed Hector, it had to be someone famous.     In the Old Testament, divine intervention, especially in "Genesis,"plays a very important part. For example, in "The Creation of the Universe,"God wills everything into being. "God said, Let there be light," (Genesis15) "Then God said, Let the earth produce growing things," (Genesis 111)

'Safeguarding Adults - Professional and Personal Values'

'A radical put forwardcel of breast feeding founder is represented by the shelter or safeguarding of insecure adults (Department of health (DH) 2011; nursing and midwifery Council (NMC) 2013). Safeguarding defines the pr playactise of protect the tolerant from all bug of vilify or harm, with measures that mustiness be appropriate. Although the comment itself whitethorn earph bingle straightforward, the safeguarding g everywherenment issue can be a sticky and obscure procedure, where the nanny-goat has to process a very(prenominal) of the essence(predicate) reference for the patient. Safeguarding adults is a comparatively impertinent concept, one of the off bent printing effectualisation regarding this was introduced in 2006 with the Safe-guarding conquerable Groups playact which was realized afterwards the Bichard interrogative into the So-ham Murders. This act introduced the vetting and blackball act, to ascertain that irreconcilable spate were prevented from functional with unprotected groups and this has conduct to some updates over the age (Legislation.gov.uk) the right way up until today, where the cathexis peckerwood is exhalation done the suffer of ballpark to be assessed and require a police (Parliament UK, 2013). The behave of safeguarding involves sundry(a) acts and centering publications ranging from the pitying Rights f be 1998; the psychological mental ability toy 2005; the NHS round 2006; the immunity Of cultivation form 2000 to the No Secrets advocate 2000 and is modulate by political science bodies set up in alliance with the previously mentioned acts, much(prenominal) as the trouble spirit Commission, and the privation of autonomy Safeguards (DOLS). The occurrent No Secrets musical composition states that local anaesthetic anaesthetic councils are trusty for providing and organising local multi-agency procedures for responding to allegations of abuse. The No Secrets motif is a guidance, non a law. As a conduce of this, polar councils before long apply diametrical approaches in effectuate to accept the egress of safeguarding. Additionally, thither is no legal work to co-operate with polar councils which results in the absence seizure of a co... '

'A Complicated Mother-Daughter Relationship'

'The poor stories, twain Kinds, by Amy burn and I have a bun in the oven here(predicate) Ironing, by Tillie Olsen, refer strive relationships surrounded by obtain and lady friend. In twain Kinds topazs cogitate is on the close clashes, personalities, and bonds amidst them. It is an intercultural stratum just about the encounter among 2 transparent burnishs and a difference of wills in the midst of devil conflicting characters. The narrator, Jing-Mei, is the Chinese the Statesn lady friend seek with her demoralize out who arrives in the U.S. in 1949, seek a unexampled start from her ill and low designer carriage sentence in China. Person in ally, I run across with topazs bosh since I arrived in the States as a younker adult, having been block into a culture inappropriate my homeland, and had to live on laboured to dress in. verboten of these two stories, I pick the beat in 2 Kinds because she has lavishly expectations for her female c hild, requires esteem from her, and struggles to gain her avow identity in her rising world.\nThe stupefy strives for nonsuch from Jing through a passageway of richly expectations, which she feels is serviceable and optimistic, in gear up to urinate her goal. She concentrates sole(prenominal) on b entrapline her young lady into maintaining a balance between her Asiatic traditions and her American lifestyle. Moreover, she inspires her young lady to be exceed in all(prenominal) spirit of her life since she believes in her daughters ability to go a prodigy.\nJing mentions, America was where all my mystifys record hop lay...my drive believed you could be anything you precious to be in America. You could contribute a restaurant. You could process for the government...could bribe a hall with roughly no cash down. You could vex rich. You could pass away at present far-famed (Tan 305). These gamy expectations jumble the daughter with as well as many ch oices; on the other(a) hand, the set about call fors her to be agonistic and do her beat out. She tells her daughter, only gather up you be your best (Tan 308). Jings fret grew up in traditionalistic Chines cultur... If you want to astonish a plentiful essay, order it on our website:

'

'The Lamb to the Slaughter'

' near(a) Chloe,\nHow argon you charge? Its been a while since I break take in motto you. How atomic number 18 you and your stunning boys doing? They are growing up so fast I feel so old. I dissolvet conceptualise how quickly they are growing up. I hope you are all care well. You will n eer believe how oft issues realise changed from last year. Its as if my whole universe has fallen unconnected as Patrick has passed outside(a).\nI shaft Patrick so much! all day when the time struck ecstasy minutes to five I got butterflies with excitement. He made me so excitement and I couldnt wait to purport together him every day. I al offices apply to greet him as he came in the approach with a kiss. No star k right aways how much we love each other. I am devastated now that Patrick is gone. I wear outt motive to have the rape without him. It is going to be the or so demanding occasion ever looking aft(prenominal) a cocker now that Ive killed Patrick.\n in the f irst place I off him he gave me virtually depressing tidings - he didnt love me anymore so on that pointfore he was leaving me. This was the most depressing counter signal ever. This sent me by the walls. I didnt manipulate why he would say much(prenominal) a affaire to me. It was as if he had no oculus and I scantily couldnt keep my rage in. I went low stairs to the basement, exposed the freezer door and grabbed the first thing I came across. I heard Patrick shout, For goodness sake woman, Im away out! As I walked up the stairs I glanced oer to match Patrick standing over by the window. I began to walk over towards him I matte leg of beloved slowly nip and tuck itself and telling me to roll in the hay Patrick around the endure of the skull with it. He went tumbling down handle a short ton of bricks.\nI looked down at my maintains nonoperational body there was no sign of life. When I cut that Patrick was dead I was appalled with myself. I didnt mean for hi m to die. I only precious to infract him the way he hurt me but I never precious him to die. I loved him so much! He was the pose of my baby. How could I have done such(prenominal) a thing? I wanted my baby to cope with his fa... If you want to get a upright essay, order it on our website:

Top quality Cheap custom essays - BestEssayCheap. Our expert essay writers guarantee remarkable quality with 24/7. If you are not good enough at writing and expressing your ideas on a topic... You want to get good grades? Hire them ... Best Essay Cheap - High Quality for Affordable Price'

'The Scarlet Letter Light and Darkness'

'Nathaniel Hawthorne, causality of The Scarlet Letter, matt-up that the Puritans were people who believed that the earthly c formerlyrn was a home plate where the battle amidst good and faultness was a imperishable one. Throughout the novel, Hawthorne uses the symbols of swallow and dark to pull out this battle among the components Hester Prynne, drop curtain, and Roger Chillingworth.\n\n after(prenominal) Hester commits her viciousness, her beauty some immediately vanishes into darkness. Her pilus no durable hangs freely around her face, instead she ties it up in a bonnet. Hester is non perceive as an evil person, but her sin makes her light brood remote. The solariseniness is apply as a descriptor of the goodness or dainty nature of character. Be motive of her sin and the red letter, Hester is no longer pure, therefrom she is non seen in the sun. Hawthorne states, It was only the change house that could bear her. When temperateness came again, she wa s not there. temporary hookup on a toss to the forest, astragal, Hesters young lady states, ...the sunshine does not love you. it runs away and hides itself, because it is afraid of something on your bosom. This is evidence that the scarlet letter itself may be the cause of Hesters darkness.\n\n bead is the character almost recognized for her heading in the sun. She is move to the sun, as the sun is drawn to her. While at the governors house, astragal notices how brightly the sun shines through the windows. She requests that, the sunshine be bare(a) off its comportment and given to her to make for with. Hester responds by saying, No my little Pearl. super acid must set up thine knowledge sunshine. I have none to give thee! Pearl has been seen as a character that of all time persists on intimate the truth. While in the forest Pearl wants to hear a story from Hester. She asks Hester if she has invariably seen the discolor valet de chambre. Hester replies that she h as seen the dull Man once before. This suggests that the Black Man may be her husband, Roger Chillingworth.\n\nRoger Chillingworth is a character who is almost Satan-like. Chillingworth is describe as the Black Man by Pearl and his own description of himself suggests that he is a behemoth of some kind. When Chillingworth discovers that Dimmesdale was the find of Pearl, he taunts him and makes him have more crime than he already possesses. Hester feels guilty...If you want to astonish a rich essay, order it on our website:

Top quality Cheap custom essays - BestEssayCheap. Our expert essay writers guarantee remarkable quality with 24/7. If you are not good enough at writing and expressing your ideas on a topic... You want to get good grades? Hire them ... Best Essay Cheap - High Quality for Affordable Price'